Skip to content
Observability for the AI era

Your dashboards are green. Your AI is lying to you.

Traditional software fails loud. AI fails quiet — drift, hallucination, stale data, unseen threats — while every dashboard stays green. Vivanti builds the observability layer that makes silent failure loud, in real time, on ClickHouse.

AI fails silently. We make it audible.

Service health · all systems100% operational
Every light is green. One model has been answering from a feed that stopped updating nine days ago.

A Vivanti whitepaper, in collaboration with ClickHouse

The problem

The four silent failures

Conventional monitoring was built to catch things going down. AI’s most expensive failures happen while everything is still up.

Stale data

Fresh-looking answers built on inputs that expired days ago. Nothing alarms.

Drift

Quiet performance decay as the world shifts under the model. By the time metrics move, trust has eroded.

Hallucination

Fluent, confident and false — the hardest failure to spot, precisely because it looks right.

Security blind spot

You can’t stop the intrusion or the data leak you never saw.

99%of organizations reported AI-related financial losses, averaging about $4.4 million each. EY Responsible AI Pulse Survey, 2025.

The idea

Observability is the smoke detector for AI.

Conventional monitoring watches for systems going down. But your AI’s worst failures happen while everything is still up. A smoke detector doesn’t wait for the fire — it watches for the smoke. AI-era observability continuously verifies your data, your AI and your security, and turns silent failure into an alarm you can actually hear.

Book a call to see what you’re missing
What we watch

Data, AI and security — on one substrate

Data observability

Freshness, quality, lineage and access — because AI inherits the condition of its data.

  • Freshness SLOs
  • Lineage
  • Governance

AI observability

Drift, hallucination, evaluation and cost: the full request-and-response record of every model and agent.

  • Drift bounds
  • LLM traces
  • Token cost

Security observability

Threats and misuse, detected over the same telemetry — the records that reveal drift also reveal intrusion.

  • Access anomalies
  • Prompt injection
  • OCSF
See it happen

Same incident. Two views.

Inject a silent failure and watch what conventional monitoring reports — then what AI-era observability reports.

Conventional monitoring

Is the system up?

  • Service uptime100%
  • Error rate (5xx)0.02%
  • p95 latency388 ms
  • Pipeline jobs succeeded24 / 24

All conventional signals inside tolerance. This panel looks identical whether the system is right or wrong.

Vivanti observability on ClickHouse

Is the system right?

  • Data freshness, all 38 sourcesWorst source 4 min behind SLO windowOK
  • Input distribution driftPSI 0.04 vs 30-day baselineOK
  • Grounded-answer rateCitations resolving to live sources98%
  • Anomalous accessNo deviation from role baselines0 OPEN

All three layers verified against declared objectives in the last 60 seconds. Green here means checked, not merely up.

Illustrative demonstration. Signal names and thresholds are configured per estate during a Vivanti engagement.

The differentiator

Why this runs on ClickHouse

Watching everything only works if watching everything is affordable — and AI-scale telemetry bankrupts legacy tools. OpenAI reportedly pays around $170M a year for Datadog. Most enterprises respond by watching less: sampling, dropping detail, shortening retention. That’s exactly how silent failures slip through.

ClickHouse flips the economics: real-time, columnar, petabyte-scale, sub-second queries, and a reported 10–100× cost saving. It anchors the whole stack.

ClickStack
Open observability for logs, metrics and traces, built on OpenTelemetry.
ClickStack AI
Observability built for AI systems and agents.
Langfuse
The leading open-source LLM-observability platform, acquired January 2026.

Cost of watching everything

What retention actually costs

Legacy per-GB tooling
$350k/yr
ClickHouse-based stack
$14k/yr

$336k saved per year — the difference between watching a sample and watching everything.

Indicative model only, at $2.40/GB ingested for legacy per-GB pricing and a 25× efficiency assumption within ClickHouse’s published 10–100× range. Not a quote. Real figures depend on schema, cardinality and tiering.

Proof

Seeing is believing

Anthropic

Describes ClickHouse as “instrumental” to developing and shipping Claude 4, running AI-era observability with lightning-fast queries.

Source: ClickHouse

Character.AI

Cut observability query latency from one to two minutes down to near-instant, across thousands of GPUs.

Source: ClickHouse

Sony

Ingests tens of millions of streaming events for real-time quality monitoring.

Source: ClickHouse

Vivanti

Data preparation and activation at scale for Electronic Arts, Pepperstone, Pacific National, and a US government document-intelligence program.

Source: Vivanti

Two-minute self-assessment

If your AI drifted tomorrow, would you know?

Six honest questions about one AI system you run in production. Nothing is sent anywhere.

  1. 01

    You can state, from a live signal, how fresh every data source feeding this system is right now.

  2. 02

    You would be alerted if the model’s input distribution shifted materially, before an output looked wrong.

  3. 03

    Every model and agent request and response is captured and queryable, with the retrieved context attached.

  4. 04

    You have a written definition of “healthy” for this system — freshness windows, drift bounds, quality thresholds.

  5. 05

    You can answer, within minutes, who or what accessed a given record and which sources produced a given output.

  6. 06

    You retain enough telemetry, for long enough, to reconstruct a decision made three months ago.

Visibility score

?

Answer the six above

Be honest rather than generous — the point of the exercise is to find the gap, not to pass.

The whitepaper

Observability for the AI Era: Detecting Silent Failure in Data and AI Systems

A Vivanti whitepaper, in collaboration with ClickHouse. Written for the data, AI, risk and security executives running AI systems in production.

  • 01The silent-failure problem: stale data, drift, hallucination and the security blind spot
  • 02Why AI changes observability — from monitoring downtime to observing correctness
  • 03Data, AI and security observability, defined as one discipline
  • 04A seven-step blueprint, from defining “healthy” to governed operations
  • 05The ClickHouse reference stack, and the economics of watching everything
  • 06A five-stage roadmap, and the barriers that stall programs

Download the whitepaper

Free, no paywall. We'll send the PDF straight to your inbox.

We never sell your details. See our privacy policy.

Who it’s for

Built for regulated, high-stakes industries

Banking, financial services & insurance

Media, entertainment & sports

Supply chain & logistics

Health & life sciences

Government & education

Book a call

Bring one AI system you’re not sure you can trust.

Give us 30 minutes. We’ll map what you can and can’t currently see across your data, AI and security — and where silent failure could be hiding right now. No slideware, no obligation.

Book a 30-minute session

Prefer to write first? jules.trono@vivanti.com

Vivanti

© Vivanti — The AI Native People Shaping Tomorrowvivanti.comVivanti on AWS MarketplacePrivacy

Statistics and product capabilities are attributed to their original publishers in the whitepaper; readers are encouraged to consult the cited sources.